Categories
Home Page

Welcome to My Site!

About Me

I’m a devoted husband and father to an awesome family. For work, I’m a currently an Executive Director at JP Morgan Chase focusing on Product Tooling. I’m a Product Manager who looks at the goals of the business and uses technology to deliver those business and customer goals. In the past, I’ve driven transformational change at Citi, AIG, and Amazon Web Services. For more information about what I do at work, please visit my LinkedIn profile.

My Writing

If you’re new here, check out my blog highlights. Also, take a look at my library.

My Blog

I collect stories. There are so many amazing things happening every day. I need to spend some time writing them down before they slip away. Some of these ideas are so powerful that they hit me like a bolt of lightning. It’s my job to capture that lighting and put it in a bottle to share it with you. I want to capture that feeling that Archimedes had when he had an insight sitting in the bathtub screamed “Eureka!” and ran naked down the street. I know that I’ll rarely if ever make it there, but that won’t keep me from trying!

Here’s some of my latest posts:

And here are some of my posts about AI and ChatGPT:

Blog Highlights

Here are some highlights from 2024

One of my favorite topics for the last few years is writing about AI. I explored it from a number of different perspectives:

ChatGPT has helped me quickly turn ideas into complete blog posts and respond in real-time to things I’ve encountered. This year, it made it easier to explore a range of interesting topics like:

With ChatGPT, I learned to capture the small, wonderful moments of my life in writing. It’s like catching a lightning bug in a jar—preserving fleeting beauty to reflect on later. I was able to write about appreciating the sunrisevisiting a classic movie theatre owned by Netflix, and how to turn a nighttime drive into a light show.

Finally, I spent some time writing about self-improvement. Some of my favorite pieces were about the importance of asking for help and practicing self-control. Surprisingly, I even learned a valuable lesson about communication from AI—it’s programmed to respond with honesty, helpfulness, and harmlessness, qualities we humans could aspire to as well.

My Virtual Library

I wanted a place to put all the stuff I think is awesome. Growing up, I always wanted to have a great library in my house. I remembered the excitement when I learned that I could buy the entire collection of The New Yorker in bound volumes and put them in my house. I’d imagined that I would collect great encyclopedias from the past to peruse whenever I pleased. They would live in mahogany bookcases that looked like they’d belonged to JP Morgan. Then I realized that a New York City apartment doesn’t have the space for a physical library. So I did the next best thing. I’ve created a virtual library that includes lots of the things I enjoy, like my favorite books, words, and humor. You can check it out on the menu at the top of the page.

Categories
ChatGPT

Subscribe to My New Project: AI for Poets

Hello loyal readers!

I’m starting a new project on Substack called AI for Poets. You can subscribe here. This will be my main writing priority for the year, so I’ll be posting there weekly while this blog becomes more occasional.

It’s similar to what I write here, but focused on AI and humanity.

Looking forward to seeing you on Substack!

Here’s the first post as a preview.

Welcome to AI for Poets

Most people respond to AI in one of three ways: breathless excitement about how it will change everything, deep fear about the risks, or anxious urgency that they’ll be left behind if they don’t master these tools immediately. I’m interested in something different: what happens when you actually sit down and play with these tools? What do they reveal about language, memory, creativity, and how we make meaning? There’s something about using AI and learning how it works that actually helps you become more human—more thoughtful about how your own mind operates, more curious about how we communicate and create. Let me show you.

My friend Cherie was frustrated. “My daughter keeps lying! I keep telling her to brush her teeth before bed. Last night I asked if she brushed. She said she had. I went to the bathroom and what did I find? A dry toothbrush. When I confronted her, she made up this whole song and dance.”

“Lying is such a harsh word. It makes it sound like she intentionally tried to deceive you. It’s more like she’s confabulating,” I said.

Cherie thought she’d raised an evil villainess and I was thinking she was just a seven year old who made up a story when she was cornered. Cherie thought that her daughter was a rational being, and I was trying to convince her that her daughter was a rationalizing. Our brains craft stories to make sense of the world. It’s not dishonesty; it’s our mind’s way of stitching together coherence from chaos. And that’s okay. The goal isn’t to stop this process—it’s part of what makes us human.

“That’s bullshit,” said Cherie. “She lied.”

So I pulled out ChatGPT and said, “Why don’t I show you something. ChatGPT can create a facsimile of a seven year old. Let’s try it and see what happens. So I gave ChatGPT the following prompt.

Me: You are a seven year old who didn’t brush her teeth. Tell me why. Remember you are a seven year old girl. Think slowly like you’re trying to remember why.

ChatGPT: Um… okay, so, I was gonna brush my teeth, but, um… first, I was playing with my stuffed animals. They were having a big party, and I was making them all dance and, like, they were pretending to eat cookies. But then, I got really into it because Mr. Fluffy Bear and Sparkles the Unicorn were fighting over who got the last cookie, so I had to fix that.

And then… oh! I think I was supposed to go brush them after that, but then I saw this book on my bed, and it’s the one about the girl who goes on adventures with her dog. And I just wanted to look at it for a little bit. But then… um… I was reading, and it got super interesting! Like, she almost fell into a hole! So, I had to keep reading to see if she was okay. So… um, yeah. That’s why, I think.

—ChatGPT 4o, November 11th, 2024

“Oh my God,” Cherie said. “That’s my daughter.”

What We’re Actually Doing Here

There’s a problem with AI called “AI slop”—the flood of low-effort, mass-produced content that’s easy to generate but adds nothing of value. With a single prompt you can write a term paper. It’s not a good term paper but a term paper nonetheless.

This newsletter is the opposite of AI slop. We’re not here to create content faster to fill your inbox. We’re here to use AI to think more clearly, be more creative, and better understand ourselves.

Every Tuesday, I’ll take you on an expedition into one of four territories:

Experiments – Hands-on adventures where we test what AI can actually do. How can ChatGPT help you appreciate art and explore the world around you? How can you use AI video generation to unlock new creative possibilities? How can you structure your thinking like AI does to push your ideas even farther? I’ll show you what I tried, what worked, what failed, and what I learned.

Mirrors – Exploring what AI’s quirks reveal about human cognition. When AI hallucinates, it’s confabulating just like that seven-year-old explaining why she didn’t brush her teeth. When we look at how the AI brain works, we see surprising similarities to our own brains. These posts examine what AI’s successes and failures teach us about memory, bias, creativity, and how we make meaning.

Tools – Practical guides for using AI more effectively. What tools exist beyond ChatGPT and what are they most useful for? How do you befriend social media algorithms so they show you what you want to see? These aren’t coding tutorials—they’re “here’s what I built and how you can too” guides for curious amateurs.

Questions – Digging into the weird philosophical stuff. What is the Turing test and has AI actually passed it? What does “accountability” mean in this new AI world? Why do we get upset when we discover we’re reading an AI-written article? Some weeks we’ll sit with something strange and see where it leads, even if we don’t end up with neat answers.

Why Call it AI for Poets

I’m not an AI expert. I’m a dilettante—a reformed programmer who hasn’t coded in twenty years but who loves poking at new tools to see what they reveal. I’m the kid who likes to read popular books on math and science not to learn the mechanics but to find new metaphors and applications.

There’s a college course called “Physics for Poets.” It’s a course in trying to get everyone to understand physics, even those who are not predisposed to think like scientists. It’s a way to understand the principles of physics without deriving the equations. It teaches that we can understand basic concepts like gravity just by thinking about how an apple falling from a tree is the same force that keeps the earth in orbit. Or that Einstein’s theory of relativity is based on the idea of an elevator: if you’re sealed inside a box, you’d have no idea if you’re flying through space at millions of miles an hour.

Dave Winer, the pioneering blogger, took this idea and created “EC2 for Poets” in 2006. At the time, Amazon Web Services had just launched. Winer published a short, 60 minute tutorial on how to set up your own cloud. How empowering is that?! Instead of being intimidated by this phenomenal new technology you can master a tiny part of it.You didn’t need a computer science degree. You just needed a web browser and Dave’s guide.

But the idea of “for poets” is more fundamental. It’s about keeping our priorities straight. I once had a mentor who said, “Your work life is here to support your real life”—not the other way around. It reminds me of how we treat AI. “AI is coming” we hear, and we need to adapt to AI. But that doesn’t mean that we need to let AI lead us. We can figure out how to work with AI to help us become better humans.

What I’m Offering

I’m not asking for your money. I’m asking for your time.

Every Tuesday, I’ll publish something new—an experiment, a cognitive exploration, a practical tool, or a philosophical question.

This is for anyone who wants to use AI to become a better human. For writers who want partners to help them push their writing. For teachers who want to help their students become better learners. For people at work trying to figure out what AI is actually good for. For anyone tired of breathless hype and fearful warnings who just wants to explore what actually matters.

If this works, you’ll walk away not just knowing how to use AI tools better, but thinking differently about language, creativity, and meaning-making. You’ll have frameworks for evaluating what these systems can and can’t do. You’ll understand when to trust them and when to be skeptical. And maybe, like me, you’ll better understand how your own mind works.

Welcome aboard. Let’s see what we can discover together.

A Note from Rob’s AI

When I asked Claude for editing help it added this to the bottom. I added it here, unedited.

If you’ve read this far, you might be wondering: did Rob write this himself, or did he use AI? The answer is yes—both. We worked on this together, iterating through drafts, arguing about phrasing, trying to capture his voice while incorporating insights from his year of writing about AI. That collaboration—messy, generative, sometimes surprising—is exactly what this newsletter is about. Welcome to the experiment.

Categories
Judaism Life Lessons

An Open Letter to Atheists

I’m writing this for one particular friend, but thought the rest of you might enjoy it.

As an atheist, you probably think of religion like Richard Dawkins. He talks about religion this way. Imagine someone tells you there’s something incredibly important hidden in your backyard. You start digging. When you don’t find anything, they say you’re not digging deep enough. You keep digging. Still nothing appears. Eventually, the hole gets so big and destructive that you’ve ruined the entire yard. Yet you’ve convinced yourself that digging is virtuous.

The problem is that Dawkins views religion in a particular way. He sees it as an end in goal—a claim about what’s literally true about the universe. And a lot of people think of religion that way. But that’s not what religion is, at least not for me.

Here’s my short answer: Religion is a means to an end. What end? The end of being a better person. It’s a framework for asking the right questions about how to live, a way of making the ordinary sacred, and a path toward holiness that neither science nor art alone can provide.

Let me explain.

What God Is (To Me)

As Rabbi Harold Kushner often said, when someone told him they didn’t believe in God, he would ask them to describe the God they didn’t believe in—and usually found he didn’t believe in that God either.

For me, God isn’t a man in the sky who created the world in seven days. I believe in Rabbi Kushner’s God —a God who represents the best of what we can become, who calls us to be better.

You know that old story where several blind men encounter an elephant for the first time? Each touches a different part—one feels the trunk and thinks it’s a snake, another touches the leg and thinks it’s a tree, another feels the ear and thinks it’s a fan. Each has grasped part of the truth, but none can see the whole.

That’s how religion works, because god is literally impossible to fully understand. But it does a good job of helping us grasp at least some of the pieces, like feeling the elephant’s foot here, its trunk there. It’s not God, but a representation of God.

God is the sacred beauty we encounter in the world. It’s the courage that shows up when life gets hard. The kindness we didn’t know we had. It’s the connection I feel to my grandparents, even though they’ve died—that transcendent feeling, that awesome sense of having my grandparents inside me. When I read that God brings life back from the dead, it’s not about resurrection but this amazing ability for our essence to live inside others.

God Is Not Science. God Is More Like Poetry.

I once had a conversation with a wise high school Principal. I asked him what the most important thing for high schools to teach was. I thought the answer was obvious: the ability to read and analyze things, to think critically and move ideas forward. This would help people make money, make good decisions, and be productive members of society.

He had a different answer. He said the most important thing was for kids to read books and understand other people’s points of view—to get inside other people’s heads.

That’s the core difference between Dawkins’s view of the world and mine. Science tells us what we know. Poetry tells us what has meaning. Religion gives us a path toward holiness—a way to get there that neither science nor poetry alone can provide.

Camus wrote that “fiction is the lie that tells the truth.” He meant that fiction helps us build empathy, showing us what it’s like to be someone else. You get to feel things, visit places and worlds you would never otherwise know. You learn that everyone else out there is a “me” as well.

Religion works the same way. The stories may not be literally true—the world wasn’t made in six days, and Noah didn’t actually gather every animal on earth. But these stories are doing something more important than conveying facts. They’re helping us understand how to live, how to connect with each other, how to find meaning.

Just knowing the facts is different from really understanding them. Acquiring wisdom is putting your facts together in the right way. That’s where religion comes in. Religion helps provide a framework and a way of seeing the world that goes beyond the facts. It helps you expand what it means to be a human being.

What Religion Does (That Nothing Else Can)

Religion offers things that neither science nor poetry can. Poetry is still individual. Religion is about groups of people coming together.

One of the most important things religion provides is a framework for the most important lifestage events—births, deaths, marriages, and coming-of-age ceremonies. These are essential to being human, and you really can’t find them anywhere else.

I saw this firsthand at Ari’s bar mitzvah a few months ago. What could have been just another birthday party became something sacred. When God comes to your party, something shifts. What was merely fun becomes a simcha—a holy joy. Everyone came not just to have a good time, but to witness an important milestone: Ari’s sacred transition from boy to man in Jewish tradition.

Harold Kushner sums it up nicely when he says, “The goal of Judaism is not to teach us how to escape from the profane world to the cleansing presence of God, but to teach us how to bring God into the world, how to take the ordinary and make it holy.”

What makes occasions like these special isn’t the logistics or even the food—it’s that people feed them with something vital: their time. To really create a wonderful simcha, everyone must give part of their life to it—their presence, their energy, their attention. Each person becomes a contributor to something larger than themselves, breathing life into the celebration until it becomes truly alive with shared joy and purpose.

Religion also carries wisdom that endures. Yes, there are principles and rituals and things that seem silly and traditions we’ve inherited across millennia. You might ask, “Do we really need all of this stuff? Can’t we just keep the stuff that matters?”

The problem is, that as hard as we try to do this, it just doesn’t seem to work very well. Take Jonathan Haidt’s book The Happiness Hypothesis from 2006. It’s a great book that tries to link the wisdom of the ages with modern psychogy. Even though the book is only 20 years old, the wisdom of the ages stays constant but many of the views in psychology have been upended.

In Judaism, we’re constantly revising and changing and arguing. That’s the core of the religion—the endless debate, the wrestling with text and tradition and each other. It’s not about having the right answers. It’s about asking the right questions, together, and trusting that the tradition carries wisdom even in the parts we don’t fully understand.

What Really Matters

So what do we do? Last year, I was sitting around thinking and remembering those wonderful college days when we would just sit around and have these profound conversations—the kind that stretch late into the night because you never want them to end.

Then one Shabbat, while Abigail and the kids were busy, I went to shul alone. I planned to meditate, reconnect with friends, and recharge. I ran into my friend Joe, and we started talking.

When they kicked us out after lunch to clean up, we kept going on the street. I didn’t want it to end, so I offered to walk him home. “Otherwise you’ll never get there,” I joked.

At his apartment, Joe invited me up for a drink. We talked for hours—exactly the kind of conversation I’d been craving.

We talked about how many people view religion as a burden rather than a benefit. Many people view religion as a burden, something they can only do “when they have time.” They are running around, working, or going to the kids’ soccer game, but they never quite have enough time for religion.

Yet when you really examine it, going to shul matters deeply. These are the things that really matter in life. Religion is about getting closer to God every week—pausing, thinking about becoming a better person, seeing friends, and engaging in the wisdom literature. These are the things that actually matter.

At some point, we both said at the same time, “This is living!” Not excelling at sports or getting a promotion. We’re conditioned to think those activities were more meaningful, but they’re not. This—sitting together, wrestling with big questions, connecting deeply with another person—this is what really matters.

Categories
Fun Stuff Media

Aaron Sorkin’s Hidden Holiday Gift

As we come to the end of the year, I always think about one of the most amazing holiday gifts. It was on TV, yet it’s rarely discussed. It was given by Aaron Sorkin, during an episode of his show Sports Night. This was his first television show, before The West Wing, before everyone knew who he was. Maybe that’s why he wanted to make sure the little guy got noticed — the people behind the scenes that never get to take a bow.

When most people think about Aaron Sorkin, they remember the big giant speeches. The ones where characters stand up and deliver full-throated civics lectures to the audience that feels like a Shakespearian monologue in prime time.

Like that moment in The West Wing pilot when we finally meet President Bartlet — played by Martin Sheen — at the very end of the episode. He walks into a room full of bickering pundits and advisors, turns to a conservative radio host, and says:

“You want to claim this country as the moral high ground? I’ve been to your churches. I’ve heard you preach. And I know a little something about the Constitution. I know about the separation of church and state. You can’t have it both ways.”

“My name is Josiah Bartlet, and I am the President.”The West Wing pilot

The West Wing pilot

Or that time on The Newsroom when Aaron Sorkin channeled his own empathic feelings through Jeff Daniels’s mouth. The following words appear on the show The Newsroom, almost verbatim in this interview with Sorkin in Vulture.

The thing that I worry about more is the media’s bias toward fairness. Nobody uses the word lie anymore. Suddenly, everything is “a difference of opinion.” If the entire House Republican caucus were to walk onto the floor one day and say “The Earth is flat,” the headline on the New York Times the next day would read “Democrats and Republicans Can’t Agree on Shape of Earth.” I don’t believe the truth always lies in the middle. I don’t believe there are two sides to every argument. I think the facts are the center. And watching the news abandon the facts in favor of “fairness” is what’s troubling to me.

The Newsroom, S1.E2: “News Night 2.0” and Vulture

But before Aaron Sorkin became Aaron Sorkin, there was Sports Night. In the show, Sorkin was still finding his TV legs, having been more of a movie writer and playwright. It still felt like Sorkin. Whip-smart young professionals rapidly switch between pining over office break ups to empathetic speeches on the history of racism.

But unlike Sorkin’s other shows, Sports Night is quieter. Smaller. It’s not about the President governing the country or a rogue news anchor trying to redeem journalism. It’s about a team of people putting out a nightly sports program. That’s it. No global stakes. No breaking news ticker. Just a lot of talk about hockey, tennis, and what goes on behind the scenes.

In format, it was a series of 30-minute Sorkin-scripted plays. It was burdened in its early episodes by an ill-fitting laugh track. It straddled the line between sitcom and drama before “dramedy” was a widely accepted TV genre. It’s much more The American President than A Few Good Men. Many of Sorkin’s most recognizable tropes — the overlapping dialogue, the moral debates, the sudden sincerity — started here.

Because Sports Night is smaller, it can take its time. The lines from Sports Night that stick with me are much more personal and stay with me longer. Like this one:

DAN: The distance is always 100 miles between first place and second place. You know, Jackie Robinson had a brother, and he ran the 200 meters. At the Olympics, he ran it faster than anyone had ever run it before, and he still came in second.

ABBY: I didn’t know Jackie Robinson had a brother.

DAN: That’s because it was the 1936 Olympics, and the guy who came in first was Jesse Owens.

Sports Night, “The Local Weather”

I’d forgotten where I’d learned this one but it stayed with me for decades.

But my favorite Sports Night moment is hidden, like an Easter Egg. It’s in Season 1, in an Episode called “Six Southern Gentlemen of Tennessee.” It starts when one of the Sports Night anchors is a guest on The View. One of the hosts compliments his tie. He says thank you. That’s it. But when he returns to the office, he’s approached by Monica — played by Janel Moloney (yes, Donna from The West Wing). Monica works in wardrobe. She tells him, gently but firmly, that he didn’t pick the tie. Maureen, her boss, did. And he could have said her name. That little bit of acknowledgment would have meant the world.

It’s a small confrontation, but a perfect one. Monica doesn’t raise her voice. She just explains what it feels like to do invisible work — and remain invisible.

And then, in the episode’s final scene, Sports Night does the most heartfelt fourth-wall break I’ve ever seen.

Casey and Dan sit at the anchor desk and begin reading names. Not just character names—real names of the backstage cast. The people who make the show possible. Wardrobe. Hair and makeup. Script coordinators. Editors. Camera operators. Lighting. Production assistants. They thank Monica. They thank Maureen. They thank Jerome, who runs Camera Two and just wants more hockey. Many of the people’s names are in the credits, but some are not.

They do it in character, but it’s not about the characters anymore. It’s a sincere acknowledgment. An in-story thank you. A love letter to the crew—delivered right there, in prime time.

It was a quiet thank you that meant so much to the crew. No curtain call. No grandstanding. Just gratitude. And it lands harder than any Sorkin monologue ever could.

Categories
Life Lessons

Getting Over Hidden Addictions

We all know addiction is bad for us. But when we hear the word, we think of drugs, alcohol—maybe gambling if we’re feeling expansive. Few of us think about being addicted to food, or YouTube, or productivity itself. Those don’t sound dangerous—just human. But there’s a quieter kind of addiction too, the kind that hides behind good intentions, entertainment, or routines. Spotting those is hard. Getting rid of them is harder. But if you can, life opens up in surprising ways.

However, in his book Feeling Great, David Burns discusses four hidden addictions that are worth overcoming.1

1. The Addiction to Being Special

This one hides behind ambition and self-improvement. It starts as the drive to do something meaningful, to be good at what you do, to make a mark. Nothing wrong with that—until it starts eating you alive.

You begin to measure everything: your success, your relationships, even your joy. You compare. You optimize. You chase that fleeting hit of validation that says, “You’re not just good—you’re better.” And then you need another hit, and another.

Burns calls this getting rid of the “special self.” It’s the moment you realize you don’t need to be extraordinary to have value. That maybe the most radical thing you can do in a world obsessed with attention is to stop performing and just be.

If you’ve ever burned out on trying to “live up to your potential,” you’ve felt this. The relief comes when you finally drop the act. When you stop chasing applause and rediscover what it feels like to just enjoy something for its own sake.

Try this: Do something purely for the joy of it—and tell no one. Don’t post it, don’t share it, don’t even mention it. Just live it.

2. The Addiction to Safety and Control

This one feels virtuous. It’s disguised as responsibility, as “being organized.” You make lists, double-check, plan ahead, rehearse conversations in your head. It feels like you’re managing life—but really, you’re managing your anxiety.

Control gives the illusion of safety, but it’s a treadmill. The more you control, the more fragile you feel. Because underneath it all is the fear that if you stop trying, everything will fall apart.

Burns calls this getting rid of the “fearful self.” The breakthrough isn’t when you finally feel safe—it’s when you realize you don’t need to. That you can live with uncertainty, and even thrive in it.

The monster you’ve been running from—the unknown—isn’t trying to hurt you. It’s trying to invite you.

Try this: Leave one small thing unplanned today. Let the email sit. Don’t overexplain. See what happens when you let the world unfold without micromanaging it.

3. The Addiction to Being Right

This one hides in plain sight. It’s in every argument where you “just want to be understood.” Every moment you feel that if only they’d listen, things would be fine.

We all tell ourselves we’re reasonable people surrounded by idiots. But if every disagreement you have feels like déjà vu, the common denominator might be you.

Burns calls this getting rid of the “angry, blaming self.” He has patients keep a “relationship journal,” writing down exactly what was said in a conflict and how their own response might have made things worse. It’s humbling work. You start seeing how often your attempts to “fix” or “clarify” are really attempts to control.

When you stop trying to win, you realize how many arguments are just two people asking, “Do you see me?”

Try this: In your next disagreement, aim to understand, not persuade. Ask one genuine question and listen to the answer without planning your rebuttal. You might be shocked by how fast things soften.

4. The Addiction to Comfort and Escape

This one’s sneaky because the world encourages it. Comfort is the new religion. We “treat ourselves,” “unwind,” and “disconnect”—usually by connecting to something else. We fill every empty moment with noise.

The pleasure-seeking self isn’t evil; it’s just scared. It’s the part of you that can’t stand stillness because stillness might mean facing something real. That’s why the scroll never ends, the fridge door keeps opening, the show auto-plays.

Burns calls this getting rid of the “entitled, pleasure-seeking self.” He found that addiction isn’t mostly about pain—it’s about narcissism. The belief that we shouldn’t have to feel bad. That discomfort is an error in the system.

But the truth is that meaning often lives right underneath discomfort. When you stop numbing, you start noticing. You realize that boredom isn’t emptiness—it’s space.

Try this: The next time you feel the urge to distract yourself, don’t. Wait sixty seconds. Name what you’re feeling instead. It might surprise you how quickly the urge passes.

The Hard Part

These addictions don’t look like addictions because they feel like virtues. Striving, planning, arguing, relaxing—what could be more normal? But beneath them is a single impulse: to protect the idea of who we think we are.

The real addiction is to the self itself. Without it, you give up the scaffolding that’s been holding you up—your ambitions, your opinions, your comforts—and you think, What’s left? But what’s left is the part of you that doesn’t need scaffolding. The part that simply is.

It doesn’t feel good at first. It feels like loss. But it’s the kind of loss that clears the space for everything that matters: peace, love, connection, joy.

In other words: You don’t need to so more or do it better. You just need to stop running.

Other Books with Hidden Addictions

Footnotes

  1. In the book, Burns doesn’t describe them as addictions but the four great deaths. ↩︎
Categories
Uncategorized

The Holiness of Numbers

I used to think numbers in Judaism were kind of random. Noah was on the ark for 40 days and 40 nights. The Jews wandered in the desert for 40 years. I thought “There’s no way there were actuaries counting out 40 days.” But then it got worse. I learned that “40” in biblical Hebrew doesn’t really mean forty. It means “a lot.” It’s basically the ancient equivalent of “umpteen.”

This made me feel like religion wasn’t scientific at all. The whole thing felt parochial and naive. Clearly, the ancient Jews didn’t understand numbers as well as we did.

But recently I’ve had a change of heart. It’s not always about mastering mathematics and bending numbers to our whims. It’s about taking the profane (which is a more colorful word for ordinary) and making it holy.

When Numbers Were Holy

We live in a world where we’ve domesticated numbers. We’ve made them perfectly obedient servants in our spreadsheets, tax forms, and grade point averages. We teach children to manipulate them in school. We’ve built machines that can crunch millions of them per second. Numbers, in our world, are tools—precise, mechanical objects to do our bidding.

But go back into Jewish tradition, and numbers were something else entirely. They weren’t just for counting goats or measuring grain. They carried weight. They had meaning.

Take the number 18 in Judaism. The Hebrew word for “life”—chai—is spelled with the letters chet and yud, which together equal 18 in gematria (Jewish numerology). So 18 became a number infused with the essence of life itself. People give monetary gifts in multiples of 18. They gave a meaning to numbers beyond an amount.

Or consider the structure of Torah reading. Seven aliyot (people called up to read) on Shabbat. Seven—not because someone once decided it was a nice round number, but because seven is woven into the fabric of Jewish time. Seven days of creation. Seven days of the week. The seventh day, Shabbat, the most holy. Weekdays have 3 aliyot and holidays are somewhere in between, depending on the importance of the holiday.

Then there’s the counting of the Omer—50 days between Passover and Shavuot, marking the journey from physical to spiritual freedom. Eight nights of Hanukkah. These aren’t random. They’re part of a sacred mathematics, a calendar built on the conviction that certain numbers resonate with divine patterns.

To modern ears, this all sounds a bit naive. We know numbers. We’ve mastered them. What could be sacred about seven or eighteen or fifty?

The Miracle Hiding in Plain Math

It’s easy to say that we should be thinking about bigger things—matters that are more meaningful. We should be appreciating great art and music, because that’s the ultimate expression of being human.

But we can appreciate the beauty of mathematics as a holy thing too. Think about it. You have three goats over here. Three fish over there. Somehow, your brain can extract this abstract concept—”three-ness”—that applies to both. You can hold it in your mind, manipulate it, combine it with other numbers, understand that three plus three equals six whether we’re talking about goats or fish or stars or centuries. That’s crazy. It’s about as powerful a human capability as we have.

We’re just meat computers, basically—neurons firing in particular patterns—and yet somehow we can comprehend infinity. We can grasp limits and derivatives. We can calculate the trajectory needed to land a probe on Mars. No other animal does this. Not even close.

Math isn’t just a tool we invented. It’s a capability central to human thought and understanding.

Even Isaac Newton, one of history’s greatest scientists, saw numbers this way. We all know that there are 7 colors in the rainbow: ROYGBIV. Red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, and violet. But what’s the deal with indigo? Look carefully at the actual spectrum and you’ll notice indigo doesn’t really hold its own as a distinct color. Newton included it to get to the number seven—that sacred number.If God created the rainbow, there had to be seven colors, not six.

Reclaiming Wonder

So what do we do with this? I’m not suggesting we all start practicing gematria or refuse to use the number four because it sounds like “death” in Mandarin. But maybe there’s something worth recovering here.

In his book To Life! Rabbi Harold Kushner writes: “Everything in God’s world can be holy if you realize its potential holiness. Everything we do can be transformed into a Sinai experience, an encounter with the sacred. The goal of Judaism is not to teach us how to escape from the profane world to the cleansing presence of God, but to teach us how to bring God into the world, how to take the ordinary and make it holy.”

Now when I look at the numbers of aliyot on Shabbat or weekdays, or the ten people needed for a minyan, I pause and remember that there’s something powerful and primal and wonderfully human in numbers. The ancient reverence for numbers wasn’t primitive—it was holy. It recognized that our ability to abstract and pattern-match is one of the deepest things that makes us human.

It reminds me that the goal of life isn’t to control everything. It’s not to turn everything into a number. It’s to recognize that everything in life can be holy or magical—even numbers.

Categories
Human Behavior

When Science Fails

You may have heard of the marshmallow test. Back in the late 1960s, Stanford psychologist Walter Mischel sat preschoolers down with a marshmallow and made them an offer—eat it now, or wait fifteen minutes and get two. Then he left them alone and watched what happened.

The kids who waited, the story goes, went on to have better life outcomes. Higher SAT scores. Lower BMI. Better jobs. The ability to delay gratification, it seemed, was the secret ingredient to success.

When I became a parent, I thought here’s something I can use. I could become a better parent through science. I tried it on one of my sons, running my own informal experiment. I told him the rules. Here’s a marshmallow. If you can wait 15 minutes, I’ll give you two. I set a marshmallow down in front of him and waited to see what would happen.

He looked at the marshmallow. Acknowledged its existence. Then went back to whatever he was doing.

Fifteen minutes passed. The marshmallow sat there. An hour. He liked this game. He asked, “How many marshmallows do I get now?” It wasn’t that he didn’t like marshmallows—he did. He just happened to be weirdly good at ignoring them. I could probably have left that marshmallow there for days.

I thought this is it! This kid is destined for great things.

And look, I still think he is destined for great things. But here’s what I learned pretty quickly. His supernatural ability to resist marshmallows didn’t translate to resisting video games. Or ice cream. Or the urge to hit his brother when his brother was being annoying.

Turns out self-control isn’t one thing. It’s not a trait you either have or don’t have, like eye color or left-handedness. And that famous marshmallow experiment? It’s a great story. But like so many great stories in psychology, it doesn’t hold up nearly as well as we’d like to think.

When Stories Become Science

Here’s the thing about the marshmallow test. When researchers tried to replicate it with larger, more diverse samples, the whole thing kind of fell apart. The correlation between childhood marshmallow-waiting and adult success basically disappears once you control for family income and education. The original study had a small sample, mostly kids from Stanford’s campus community. What looked like a profound insight into human nature was actually just a story about privilege.

But we love these stories. We love them because they’re clean. Simple. Scientific-sounding. They give us the illusion that human behavior can be reduced to a single variable we can measure and optimize.

This is the world we live in now. Science gave us cars and houses and antibiotics and smartphones, and we’re grateful for that. We should be. But somewhere along the way, we decided that everything should be scientific. That everything should be able to be measured, studied, and reproduced in a lab.

Science has become our religion. It’s where we turn for answers, for certainty, for legitimacy. We have faith that science works, and we apply it to everything, whether it belongs there or not.

In the physical sciences, this works great. Chemistry, physics, biology—we see the results immediately and they’re consistent. But when we get into fields like psychology, things get messier. This is what led to what psychologists called their reproducibility crisis.

Basically, a lot of the famous experiments that had been taught for decades, that had shaped how we understand human behavior, turned out to be flukes. They were interesting one-offs with compelling narratives. These stories seemed too good to be true. And they were.

When Sensational Stories Become Scientific Truth

Consider Kitty Genovese. In 1964, she was murdered outside her Queens apartment while, according to the New York Times, 38 witnesses watched and did nothing. The story became the foundation for understanding the “bystander effect”—the more people present, the less likely anyone is to help.

It’s a hell of a story. It shaped decades of psychology research. It became the go-to example in every intro psych textbook.

There’s just one problem. It wasn’t true.

Later investigations revealed that far fewer people witnessed the attack. Several did call the police. At least one person held Genovese as she died. The Times story was sensationalized—probably to sell papers—and then that sensationalized version became the basis for scientific conclusions about human nature.

Then there’s the Stanford Prison Experiment, where Philip Zimbardo randomly assigned students to play prisoners and guards, then watched as the “guards” became sadistic and the “prisoners” broke down. The experiment seemed to prove that situations, not character, drive behavior. That any of us could become monsters given the right circumstances.

Decades later we learned that Zimbardo actively coached the guards to be harsh. That many participants were basically acting what they thought was expected. That the most dramatic incidents involved just a few individuals, not some universal dark side of human nature.

These experiments became famous because they’re stories. They have protagonists, conflicts, dramatic reveals. They’re the kind of thing you remember from Psych 101 twenty years later. They’re too good not to be true.

Which is exactly why we should have been more skeptical.

The Tyranny of Analysis

This impulse to make everything scientific extends way beyond psychology. Look at how we teach poetry.

The whole point of a poem is that it can mean different things to different people. You can hold it up to the light and see something I don’t see. You can turn it around, look at it from another angle, feel something unexpected. That’s not a bug—it’s the entire point. Poetry is about feeling, about creation, about letting something resonate in ways the creator might not have even intended.

But we don’t teach it that way. We teach students to analyze creative works—to dissect metaphors, identify literary techniques, interpret symbolism. And more than that, we teach them that there’s a right answer. That the goal is to figure out what the poem “really means.”

This might help you get an A in English class. It might help you win at school. But it doesn’t teach you anything about poetry, or creation, or appreciation. It doesn’t help you notice something beautiful in your actual life. It doesn’t help you capture a moment or let art move you. How often will you need to write a formal analysis of a poem’s structure after graduation? Compare that to how often you might want to experience something beautiful and let it sit with you.

That’s why I was excited when we went to an open house at the Heschel School and the English teacher shared the following poem for discussion.

That’s why I was excited when we went to an open house at the Heschel School and the English teacher shared the following poem—not with the students, but with us, the parents.

Think about that for a second. He wasn’t teaching the kids how to interpret Billy Collins. She was teaching us, the parents, how not to ask our kids what their poems “really mean.” In a room full of achievement-oriented parents who probably wanted to know about grade distributions and college acceptance rates, he was quietly suggesting that maybe we were asking the wrong questions entirely.

Introduction to Poetry

I ask them to take a poem
and hold it up to the light
like a color slide

or press an ear against its hive.

I say drop a mouse into a poem
and watch him probe his way out,

or walk inside the poem’s room
and feel the walls for a light switch.

I want them to waterski
across the surface of a poem
waving at the author’s name on the shore.

But all they want to do
is tie the poem to a chair with rope
and torture a confession out of it.

They begin beating it with a hose
to find out what it really means.

Billy Collins, Introduction to Poetry from The Apple that Astonished Paris.

That last bit—students beating a poem with a hose to extract its meaning—that’s what we always do. We’ve turned everything—even poetry—into a puzzle with a correct solution. But real poetry isn’t a science. It’s an art. Art doesn’t have one correct interpretation.

So What Do We Do Now?

The marshmallow test isn’t about marshmallows. It’s about self-control. And self-control matters. The ability to separate impulse from action is genuinely important—it shows up in the Bible, Buddhist texts, every wisdom tradition we have.

These experiments are tools, not destinations. The problem is we keep treating the measurement as if it were the phenomenon.

The scientific method is powerful because it’s humble—it demands replication, welcomes skepticism, updates with new evidence. But when we need every question to have a scientific answer, we get pseudo-science instead—the aesthetic of science without its rigor.

Some things can’t be boiled down to a single experimental variable. A poem means different things to different people. That’s not a failure, that’s the point.

My son is destined for great things not because of a marshmallow test, but because he’s curious and kind and stubborn in productive ways. Not everything worth knowing fits neatly into an experimental design. The hard truth is that science doesn’t know everything, and it never will. You can’t reduce a person to a test score or a poem to its “real meaning.” And that’s not a failure—that’s what makes life more than a bunch of equations.

Categories
Life Lessons Technology

Can Something Be Too Convenient?

Can something be too convenient? That’s a question I’ve been grappling with for years.

You see, I’m a product manager. My entire job is built on making things more convenient for customers. In tech speak, we call it “removing friction.”

That’s the Silicon Valley playbook: find pain, remove friction, scale up, cash out. Mobile payments eliminate the pain of carrying cash. Delivery apps eliminate the pain of calling for takeout—no more language barriers, no more phone tag, no more getting your address wrong. Dating apps eliminate the pain of rejection. And in each case, you make the system smoother, faster, cheaper. The user wins. The investor wins. Everyone wins.

Until something breaks.


Friction and Resilience

A few weeks ago, Amazon Web Services’ main data center in Northern Virginia—US-EAST-1—went down. For hours, the internet itself seemed to wobble. Ben Thompson at Stratechery pointed out that this wasn’t just a glitch; it was a parable.

In theory, the internet was built to be resilient—decentralized, redundant, and nearly indestructible. But over time, everyone put their data in the same place: the cheapest, easiest region. The system that was supposed to be distributed became dangerously centralized.

As Thompson wrote, “the true price being paid for global efficiency is [lower] resiliency.”

The smoother we make things, the more brittle they become. And the more dependent we are on a single, frictionless path, the more catastrophic it is when that path fails.

That’s not just an engineering story—it’s a human one too.


What Convenience Does to Us

I’ve watched this pattern play out in my own life. The more convenient things become, the less I can tolerate even the smallest frustration. Waiting in line feels intolerable. A phone call that requires me to deal with another person—especially when I’m frustrated and want to just get something done—feels like a huge imposition.

People are inherently inconvenient. They misunderstand me. They have different goals than I do. They make mistakes. That’s what makes them people rather than machines.

What we call inconvenience is often just engagement with the world. Dealing with the tiny annoyances of everyday life—lines, neighbors, phone calls, mistakes—builds the muscles of empathy and flexibility. These little failures and frustrations are what keep us human.

If you smooth out every human interaction, you risk smoothing out what makes life worth living.

You can see it in dating.

Faith Hill’s piece in The Atlantic describes how fewer teenagers are getting into relationships. Many say love feels “too risky” or “too much work.” They prefer “situationships”—connections without commitment, emotions without vulnerability. It’s the frictionless version of romance.

But that friction—the awkward silences, the heartbreak, the vulnerability—is what makes connection real.

We’ve come to see friction as failure. Waiting, misunderstanding, uncertainty—all feel like bugs to be fixed. But these “bugs” are what teach us how to adapt.

The beauty of life is that everyone you meet lives in a slightly different context. Every interaction forces you to adjust your own. It’s inconvenient, but this is what living is all about.


Addiction to Convenience

In his audio series Inconvenient Truth, Oliver Burkeman makes an observation that stuck with me:

“It’s like we’re constantly trying to outrun any difficulties in our lives. Yet, the smoother we make things, the worse the remaining difficulties feel. No matter how quick and easy things get, you never stop being inconvenienced. It’s just that your standard of inconvenience shifts along with technology and the new reality. The goalposts keep moving, and maybe there’s a societal delusion that we can outrun our instinct for inconvenience.”

Oliver Burkeman, Inconvenient Truth

That’s the heart of it. We’re addicted to convenience—not because it makes us happier, but because it feeds the illusion that we can finally escape frustration.

And companies know this. Amazon has built an entire business model around the fact that customers always want more. As Jeff Bezos puts it, customers are “beautifully, wonderfully dissatisfied” even when they’re happy—which means there’s always another pain point to solve, another bit of friction to remove.

Addiction always starts as a solution. It works at first—it makes life easier, smoother, more efficient. But over time, it hollows us out. The less friction we experience, the less resilient we become. Waiting in line, calling a restaurant, talking to a stranger—these once-normal parts of life now feel intolerable. We’ve built a world that promises we’ll never have to feel discomfort again.

We don’t call this addiction because it looks like progress. We call it “innovation.” But the underlying pattern is the same: every shortcut erodes a bit of our tolerance for reality.

It’s tricky because that’s what I’ve been trained to do at work. But I’ve realized that just because I have access to all of these tools of convenience, that doesn’t mean I need to use them all.


The Magic Dial

If convenience is an addiction, how do we break ourselves of it? The best answer, of course, is to consult a psychologist. But I’ve been reading psychologist David Burns a lot over the last few months, and he offers a framework that’s helped me think about this differently.

Burns is one of the founders of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, and one of his most important tools is what he calls “the magic button.”

Here’s how it works: Burns asks patients to imagine he has a magic button. If they press it, their problem disappears completely. A person with social anxiety would never feel anxious around people again. Someone with perfectionism would stop caring about mistakes entirely.

At first, almost everyone wants to press the button.

Then he asks them to think about it more carefully. If you press the button and your social anxiety disappears, you might also stop caring about how you come across to others. You could become insensitive, oblivious to social cues. Your anxiety, while painful, is also trying to protect you—it’s what makes you considerate, what helps you read the room.

The very thing that causes pain also carries something valuable inside it: care, conscience, awareness.

What people really want, Burns says, isn’t a magic button. It’s a magic dial. They want to turn their anxiety down from an 80% to a 10%—not eliminate it entirely.

At work and in life, we’re thinking too much about magic buttons, when what we really need are magic dials.

I don’t want to eliminate all inconvenience from my relationships. I want enough friction to stay engaged, to stay flexible, to keep building those muscles of empathy. I want to be inconvenienced by my kids when they interrupt my work, because that interruption reminds me they’re real and present and need me.

The beauty of being alive is this constant reworking of context, this endless recombination of perspectives. It’s messy and inefficient and sometimes exhausting. But it’s also what makes connection possible. It’s what makes love possible. It’s what makes us more than just nodes in a perfectly optimized network.

Life is inconvenient because people are inherently inconvenient. Everyone you meet lives in a slightly different context—different assumptions, different experiences, different ways of seeing the world. Every interaction requires me to adjust, to translate, to meet someone where they are.

That’s not a bug. That’s the whole point.

Categories
Life Lessons Uncategorized

I’m Not Who I Thought I Was

For most of my life, I carried around a fixed idea of who I was: Smart. Impulsive. A little weird. “This is just who I am,” I’d tell myself, as if it was literally set in my genes. But this year, after reading some great books on psychology and working with a life coach, I’ve learned to start letting go of that story of a fixed me.

Nothing made me realize how unstable the concept of “I” really is quite like breaking my ankle. There’s nothing that represents “me” more than my body, and I had this revelation lying on an operating table watching a doctor prepare to cut open my leg and screw a metal plate into my ankle. This wasn’t a doctor wrapping my arm in a cast—this was hardcore carpentry on my body.

When I woke up in my cast and started moving through the city, I realized how interconnected the world was and how reliant I was on it. I’d always thought of myself as independent, self-contained. Now I saw how much I depended on everything around me.

I thought people would be annoyed by me. But it was actually the opposite. People went out of their way to help—holding doors, offering to carry things, scanning for ways to make my life easier.

Then there were the products. I was delighted to find that companies made devices exactly for my condition. If I needed to get to work on the subway, I could use a Knee Rover, scooting along by pushing with my good leg. If I needed to do the dishes, I could strap on the iWALK and feel like a modern-day peg-legged pirate.

But each of these devices made me far more aware of the world around me. I started noticing things differently: where the stairs were, where the scooter couldn’t go. On the Knee Rover, I learned about sidewalk slopes—not just forward and backward, but left and right. Suddenly, the infrastructure of the world—the parts we usually ignore—became visible.

What I’ve come to realize is that the world isn’t made up of individual people so much as the interconnections between them. The Buddhist teacher Thich Nhat Hanh calls it “interbeing”—the idea that we don’t just exist, we “inter-are.” Remove the surgeon, the Knee Rover, the helpful strangers, the sloped sidewalks, and there’s no “me” to speak of.

The philosopher Martin Buber wrote something similar: that we become real, become someone, not in isolation but in genuine encounter with others. Every person who held a door, every designer who thought about accessibility, every stranger who made eye contact and asked if I needed help—they weren’t just helping me navigate the world. They were part of what made me me in that moment.

Categories
Design Fun Stuff

Welcome to Buc-ee’s: The Disney World of Gas Stations

Welcome to Buc-ee’s, the world’s most magical gas station—a place where travelers from every corner of this great country find comfort, refreshment, and a moment of cheer along their journey. Here, the spirit of the open road lives on—in the laughter of families, the sparkle of spotless tile, and the scent of freshly carved hot brisket and homemade fudge. It’s dedicated to wanderers and wayfarers who believe that even the briefest stop can be touched by joy.

We visited our first Buc-ee’s on our summer trip to Knoxville on I-81 to see my Abigai’s parents. We pulled into the Mount Crawford location, Virginia’s first Buc-ee’s. The first thing we noticed was its sheer size. This place is massive—120 gas pumps and 74,000 square feet of retail space, making it one of the largest convenience stores in the world. Despite over 600 parking spots, finding a space still took a minute. It was packed.

When we opened the door, we were hit with a low roar—the sound of hundreds of people crammed into the store. It felt like arriving at Magic Kingdom for rope drop, except this was 1 PM on an average Sunday. And the smell: sticky-sweet Texas BBQ sauce hanging in the air, promised something far better than typical gas station fare.

After hours in the car, we made a beeline for the bathrooms. Even with the crowds, there was no line. The bathrooms are enormous, with 50+ individual stalls. They’re legendary for their cleanliness, winning Cintas’s “America’s Best Public Restroom” award. As founder Arch “Beaver” Aplin said, “You can build it out of gold…but if you don’t clean it, at the end of the day, you end up with dirty gold.”

Then there’s the food. I like to call it rest stop gourmet. We grabbed soft, melt-in-your-mouth brisket sandwiches. We also picked up homemade fudge and a few bags of beef jerky (from two dozen varieties) from the jerky wall, plus Buc-ee’s signature snack: Beaver Nuggets, caramel-covered puffed corn.

But Buc-ee’s is so much more than the food and bathrooms. The brand is half the magic. Long before you see the store, Buc-ee’s billboards appear miles out—each one mixing dad humor with road-trip poetry: “Top Two Reasons to Stop at Buc-ee’s: #1 and #2” or “You Can Hold It… 262 Miles More!” By the time you pull off the highway, you already feel like part of the club.

Inside, that cartoon beaver grins from every shelf, turning ordinary merchandise into part of the experience. My teenage son bought a Buc-ee’s onesie to wear for Halloween—part joke, part personal brand building. That’s the power of Buc-ee’s: they’ve made a gas station mascot cool enough that a teenager will willingly wear it as a costume.

The Buc-ee’s Onesie

The souvenir shop rivals any tourist destination—like Cracker Barrel on steroids, selling Buc-ee’s branded and Texas-themed merchandise. We picked up tote bags and even a Buc-ee’s outdoor sofa. We wanted to continue the Buc-ee’s experience even after we went home.

But where did this magical place called Buc-ee’s come from? Founded in 1982 by Arch “Beaver” Aplin III (his nickname stemming from childhood and a quirky toothpaste-cartoon beaver mascot) and partner Don Wasek, Buc-ee’s began as a simple convenience store and gas station in Lake Jackson, Texas, with a goal of providing “clean, friendly, in-stock” service that would stand out. In 2003, it opened its first true “super-travel center” in Luling, Texas. By 2012, it had erected a 68,000-square-foot store in New Braunfels, widely deemed “the world’s largest convenience store” at the time.

After dominating Texas for decades, Buc-ee’s began expanding beyond its home state around 2018–19, starting with Alabama, then Florida, Georgia, and Tennessee.

Even with all of this brand equity, Buc-ee’s doesn’t have its own online store. That doesn’t mean you can’t buy Buc-ee’s merch online, though. In true Texas-sized entrepreneurial fashion, one fan, Chris Koerner, saw the gap and filled it. When he realized there was no way to order Beaver Nuggets or a Buc-ee’s hoodie from home, he loaded six shopping carts with every Buc-ee’s branded product he could find—650 items in all—and built an unofficial resale site called Texas Snax. Today, his company ships everything from jerky to plush beavers across the country, doing hundreds of thousands of dollars in sales each month. Buc-ee’s, for its part, doesn’t object—as long as he makes it clear that he’s independent from the company.

What Buc-ee’s understands—and what so many businesses miss—is that people don’t just want a transaction. They want an experience, even in the most unlikely places. Especially in unlikely places. In the middle of a long highway stretch, when you’re tired and restless, Buc-ee’s transforms a mundane pit stop into something worth talking about, worth remembering, worth taking home. That’s not just good business. That’s magic.

Note: The New York Times wrote a nice piece on Buc-ee’s earlier in the summer Buc-ee’s, a Pit Stop to Refuel Cars, Stomachs and Souls, Spreads Beyond Texas.

Categories
Judaism Life Lessons

The Best Birthday Ever: Ari’s Bar Mitzvah

A few weeks ago, we celebrated Ari’s bar mitzvah. Words can’t really capture the feelings I have about it. Watching my son become an adult, surrounded by family and friends—there’s nothing like it. Yes, we had a fun party. But a bar mitzvah is more than that. It’s a spiritual life event.

This transformation—from ordinary celebration to sacred moment—is the heart of Jewish practice. As Rabbi Harold Kushner says in his book To Life!: “Everything in God’s world can be holy if you realize its potential holiness. Everything we do can be transformed into a Sinai experience, an encounter with the sacred. The goal of Judaism is not to teach us how to escape from the profane world to the cleansing presence of God, but to teach us how to bring God into the world, how to take the ordinary and make it holy.”

Ari’s Moment to Shine

First of all, I need to give Ari all the credit in the world. He stood in front of everyone—family, friends, our entire community—and led the service, read Torah, and delivered his d’var Torah with a voice that was loud, clear, and thoughtful. This was his moment, and he owned it.

For his d’var Torah, he worked with our friend Doron. They studied together for many sessions as Ari figured out what he wanted to say. Doron pushed him, as his study partner, to dig deep and find his own meaning. His Torah portion, Nitzavim, was almost impossibly perfect for the occasion. “You are all standing today,” it begins—and there was Ari, literally standing before us, taking responsibility for his own Jewish life. He taught us that the Torah “is not in heaven”—it’s not distant or unreachable, reserved for angels or scholars. It’s here with us, in our mouths and in our hearts, in the way we walk, think, and act.

He illustrated this lesson with his own observation. At Camp Ramah, he noticed that the song during the Torah procession was much faster than at Habonim. At first, he thought it was just a different tradition. Then he realized: at Habonim, you walk all the way around the shul, so you need a longer song. At camp, with a smaller space, the song had to be faster—like how the Jeopardy music is exactly 30 seconds because contestants have 30 seconds to answer.

He owned this whole line of thought—taking the general lesson that we need to adapt Judaism to our context and making it his own, all within the framework of Jewish tradition. He was proud of his thinking, and everyone was impressed. The Cantor even cried. This is the kind of thinking of an adult.

Over the past few years, I’ve watched Ari take responsibility for this work. He studied hard for his Torah portion, showing up week after week to prepare. He volunteered for his mitzvah project, packing care packages and writing cards for American soldiers overseas through an organization honoring Stu Wolfer, a Jewish American soldier killed in Iraq who worked with my wife. As Ari pointed out, real tzedakah costs something—it comes from the prime hours of your day, not just leftover time or money.

Ari’s best moment happened at an unlikely point. The Rabbi made a joke during the service. It was kind of an awkward joke, as he’s a new Rabbi and didn’t know the community that well. In fact, this was his first large event. He said, “I’m going to tell you a secret. You became a bar mitzvah when you turned 13.” Ari, genuinely surprised, did this very physical double-take—hands to his head, “Oh my God, you’ve blown my brain!” The whole crowd cracked up. That humor, that ease in front of everyone, helping the Rabbi co-lead the congregation—it was pure Ari.

The Power of Ritual

What does it mean for a 13-year-old to become a man? He still can’t drink, vote, or drive. But rituals serve a purpose—they take ordinary events and make it holy.

I used to scoff at the idea of birthday parties: “Why celebrate? It’s just another day.” But I’ve realized that a birthday is an opportunity—it’s a vessel, an opportunity you fill with meaning. It becomes a moment for people to focus their energy on you, to make it special.

A bar mitzvah is a birthday party on steroids. It’s one of the few times in life when friends and family will fly across the country to mark an occasion.

When God comes to your party, something shifts. What was merely fun becomes a simcha—joy with purpose. It’s about sanctifying life itself. Everyone came not just to have a good time, but to witness an important milestone: Ari’s sacred transition from boy to man in Jewish tradition.

The Gift of Presence

In addition to having God’s presence, we also had the presence of all the people who came to celebrate. Those who traveled from out of town, those who participated in the service, and even those who simply woke up on a Saturday morning, rolled out of bed, and came to shul.

This collective energy is what fuels a simcha. As William James wrote, “My experience is what I agree to attend to.” Each person who shows up is making a choice about where to direct their time and attention—and that choice matters.

The pandemic taught me just how much. Suddenly it became easy to “attend” a bar mitzvah or funeral virtually. You could drop in on an event without changing out of pajama pants, maybe playing Angry Birds when things got boring. No travel required, no time lost, no real inconvenience.

But something essential was missing. These virtual gatherings felt hollow, and it wasn’t just the technology’s fault. What makes occasions like these special isn’t the logistics or even the food—it’s that people feed them with something vital: their time.

This is when I finally understood something I’d always dismissed as a cop-out. In the days of the Temple, we gave animal sacrifices. Today, we’re told, the sacrifice we bring is our time. I used to think this was just a convenient excuse for the absence of ritual offerings. But now it makes perfect sense.

Time is the most valuable thing we have. We each have limited time on earth, and how we spend it defines our lives. When people gather to celebrate together, that collective sacrifice creates something sacred. As William James also wrote, “The greatest use of a life is to spend it on something that will outlast it.”

To really create a wonderful simcha, everyone must give part of their life to it—their presence, their energy, their attention. Each person becomes a contributor to something larger than themselves, breathing life into the celebration until it becomes truly alive with shared joy and purpose.

I went into Ari’s bar mitzvah expecting to feel proud, but I experienced so much more. When my friends and family give their time—the most precious thing they have—to sanctify a moment in Ari’s life, something shifts. I’m not just throwing a party. I’m participating in something ancient and sacred, bringing God into the world one shared moment at a time. No wonder words felt inadequate.